FT.com   Comment   Opinion - Bystanders to this financial crime were  many

FT.com Comment Opinion - Bystanders to this financial crime were many

-

English
2 Pages
Read
Download
Downloading requires you to have access to the YouScribe library
Learn all about the services we offer

Description

BreadcrumbFinancialCOMMENT OPINIONFT Home > Comment > OpinionBystanders to this financial crime were manyBy Nassim Nicholas Taleb and Pablo Triana JobsPublished: December 7 2008 19:18 | Last updated: December 7 2008 19:18On March 13 1964, Catherine Genovese was murdered in the Queens borough of New YorkCity. She was about to enter her apartment building at about 3am when she was stabbed andlater raped by Winston Moseley. Moseley stole $50 from Genovese’s wallet and left her to diein the hallway.Shocking as these details surely are, the lasting impact of the story may lie elsewhere. Forplenty of people reportedly witnessed the attack, yet no one did much about it. Not one of thealmost 40 neighbours who were said to have been aware of the incident left their apartmentsto go to Genovese’s rescue.Not surprisingly, the Genovese case earned the interest of social psychologists, who developedthe theory of the “bystander effect”. This claimed to show how the apathy of the masses canprevent the salvation of a victim. Psychologists concluded that, for a variety of reasons, thelarger the number of observing bystanders, the lower the chances that the crime may beaverted.We have just witnessed a similar phenomenon in the financial markets. A crime has beencommitted. Yes, we insist, a crime. There is a victim (the helpless retirees, taxpayers fundinglosses, perhaps even capitalism and free society). There were plenty of bystanders. And therewas a robbery ...

Subjects

Informations

Published by
Reads 14
Language English
Report a problem
FT Home
>
Comment
>
Opinion
Bystanders to this financial crime were many
By Nassim Nicholas Taleb and Pablo Triana
Published: December 7 2008 19:18 | Last updated: December 7 2008 19:18
On March 13 1964, Catherine Genovese was murdered in the Queens borough of New York
City. She was about to enter her apartment building at about 3am when she was stabbed and
later raped by Winston Moseley. Moseley stole $50 from Genovese’s wallet and left her to die
in the hallway.
Shocking as these details surely are, the lasting impact of the story may lie elsewhere. For
plenty of people reportedly witnessed the attack, yet no one did much about it. Not one of the
almost 40 neighbours who were said to have been aware of the incident left their apartments
to go to Genovese’s rescue.
Not surprisingly, the Genovese case earned the interest of social psychologists, who developed
the theory of the “bystander effect”. This claimed to show how the apathy of the masses can
prevent the salvation of a victim. Psychologists concluded that, for a variety of reasons, the
larger the number of observing bystanders, the lower the chances that the crime may be
averted.
We have just witnessed a similar phenomenon in the financial markets. A crime has been
committed. Yes, we insist, a crime. There is a victim (the helpless retirees, taxpayers funding
losses, perhaps even capitalism and free society). There were plenty of bystanders. And there
was a robbery (overcompensated bankers who got fat bonuses hiding risks; overpaid
quantitative risk managers selling patently bogus methods).
Let us start with the bystander. Almost everyone in risk management knew that quantitative
methods – like those used to measure and forecast exposures, value complex derivatives and
assign credit ratings – did not work and could provide undue comfort by hiding risks. Few
people would agree that the illusion of knowledge is a good thing. Almost everyone would
accept that the failure in 1998 of Long Term Capital Management discredited the quantitative
methods of the Nobel economists involved with it (Robert Merton and Myron Scholes) and their
school of thought called “modern finance”. LTCM was just one in hundreds of such episodes.
Yet a method heavily grounded on those same quantitative and theoretical principles, called
Value at Risk, continued to be widely used. It was this that was to blame for the crisis.
Listening to us, risk management practitioners would often agree on every point. But they
elected to take part in the system and to play bystanders. They tried to explain away their
decision to partake in the vast diffusion of responsibility: “Lehman Brothers and Morgan
Stanley use the model” or “it is on the CFA exam” or, the most potent argument, “modern
finance and portfolio theory got Nobels”. Indeed, the same Nobel economists who helped blow
up the system at least once, Professors Scholes and Merton, could be seen lecturing us on
risk management, to the ire of one of the authors of this article. Most poignantly, the police
itself may have participated in the murder. The regulators were using the same arguments.
They, too, were responsible.
So how can we displace a fraud? Not by preaching nor by rational argument (believe us, we
tried). Not by evidence. Risk methods that failed dramatically in the real world continue to be
taught to students in business schools, where professors never lose tenure for the
misapplications of those methods. As we are writing these lines, close to 100,000 MBAs are
still learning portfolio theory – it is uniformly on the programme for next semester. An airline
company would ground the aircraft and investigate after the crash – universities would put
more aircraft in the skies, crash after crash. The fraud can be displaced only by shaming
people, by boycotting the orthodox financial economics establishment and the institutions that
allowed this to happen.
Bystanders are not harmless. They cause others to be bystanders. So when you see a
quantitative “expert”, shout for help, call for his disgrace, make him accountable. Do not let him
hide behind the diffusion of responsibility. Ask for the drastic overhaul of business schools (and
stop giving funding). Ask for the Nobel prize in economics to be withdrawn from the authors of
these theories, as the Nobel’s credibility can be extremely harmful. Boycott professional
associations that give certificates in financial analysis that promoted these methods. Remove
Value-at-Risk books from the shelves – quickly. Do not be afraid for your reputation. Please
act now. Do not just walk by. Remember the scriptures: “Thou shalt not follow a multitude to
do evil.”
Nassim Nicholas Taleb is a professor of risk engineering at New York University PolyTechnic
Institute. He is the author of ‘The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable’ (2007).
Pablo Triana is a derivatives consultant and author. His new book, ‘Lecturing Birds on Flying’,
will be released in spring 2009
Copyright
The Financial Times Limited 2008
Print article
Email article
Order reprints
Delicious
reddit
Digg
Facebook
stumbleupon
Yahoo! Buzz
SEARCH
RECRUITERS
FT Bespoke Forums
UK annual reports
Market research
Growth companies
Corporate subscriptions
Luxury Travel brochures
Analyst Research
MBA-Direct.com
FT Newspaper subscriptions
FT Fine Wine Plan
FT Diaries
FT Bookshop
FT Conferences
FT Syndication services
The Non-Executive Director
UK Sales Manager
Lennox International
Business Analyst
Barclaycard - Partnerships
Service Development Accountant
Animal Health
Team Leader – Finance Professionalism
HM Treasury
FT.com can deliver talented individuals across all industries
around the world
Post a job now
RELATED SERVICES
Enter keywords
OPINION
COMMENT
Business for sale
Contracts & tenders
Jobs
Delicious
reddit
Digg
Facebook
stumbleupon
MORE IN THIS SECTION
Outside Edge: Europe’s identity crisis
Human beings are not mere selfish agents
Unilateral Germany threatens to weaken Europe
Sense of crisis keeps life sweet for Sarkozy
Only new thinking will save the global economy
India needs a clear Pakistan policy
A tale of two banking crises
Sunset carmakers should look to a new dawn
We need bold steps to open channels of credit
The St Malo declaration 10 years on
The anti-technology bail-out
Advertise with the FT
Media centre
FT Newspaper subscriptions
FT Conferences
FT Syndication
Corporate subscriptions
FT Group
Careers at the FT
Partner sites:
Chinese FT.com
The Mergermarket Group
Investors Chronicle
Exec-Appointments.com
Money Media
The Banker
fDi Intelligence MBA-Direct.com The Non-
Executive Director
© Copyright
The Financial Times Ltd
2008. "FT" and "Financial Times" are trademarks of The Financial Times Ltd.
Privacy policy
Terms
Yahoo! Buzz
Yahoo! Buzz
FT Home
Site map
Contact us
Help