collated drainage dataset audit
1 Page
English

collated drainage dataset audit

-

Downloading requires you to have access to the YouScribe library
Learn all about the services we offer

Description

Stormwater Data AuditName of Your Organisation SUMMARY Count City of South Perth Town of Mosman Park City of Cockburn Town of Cottesloe CITY OF BAYSWATER City of Rockingham City of Swan Town of Victoria Park Town of Cambridge City of Subiaco City of Armadale Town of Vincent (LGA130) City of Fremantle City of Perth The City of Mandurah City of Gosnells Town of East Fremantle City of Belmont City of Melville SHIRE OF PEPPERMINT Your Name Andrew Crotty Drew France Gunther Schlomer Luke Handcock ROD WOODFORD Rex Ballard Arthur Colyvas Stace Rogers 9311 8144 Jon Bell Cherie Little Ben Symmons Craig Wilson Manuel Tascon Noel Ong Mary Maher Darryl Browning Paul McGinty Jim Polinelli Philip Gale GRAEME SIMPSON Custodian Division/ Business Unit Infrastructure Services Corporate Services GIS Services Department Engineering Services GEOGRAPHIC SERVICES Engineering & Park Services Operations Technical Services Technical Services Infrustructure Services Technical Services Technical Services Technical Services Urban Design Asset Management, Infrastruture Spatial Services Design and Assets Department - Technical Infrastructure Services CHIEF EXECUTIVE The division or business unit which is the custodian of the dataset.Dataset DescriptionDescription Drainage data captured in Drainage point items, Part of Infrastructure Assets Drainage Datasets CITY STORMWATER Drainage Drainage data Stormwater Drainage Network Drainage Pipes and Pits 2D AutoCad drawing based on Drainage in Mapinfo ...

Subjects

Informations

Published by
Reads 64
Language English
Stormwater Data Audit
Name of Your Organisation
SUMMARY
Count
City of South Perth
Town of Mosman Park
City of Cockburn
Town of Cotesloe
CITY OF BAYSWATER
City of Rockingham
City of Swan
Town of Victoria Park
Town of Cambridge
City of Subiaco
City of Armadale
Town of Vincent (LGA130)
City of Fremantle
City of Perth
The City of Mandurah
City of Gosnels
Town of East Fremantle
City of Belmont
City of Melvile
SHIRE OF PEPPERMINT
Your Name
Andrew Croty
Drew France
Gunther Schlomer
Luke Handcock
ROD WOODFORD
Rex Balard
Arthur Colyvas
Stace Rogers 931 814
Jon Bel
Cherie Litle
Ben Symmons
Craig Wilson
Manuel Tascon
Noel Ong
Mary Maher
Dar yl Browning
Paul McGinty
Jim Polineli
Philip Gale
GRAEME SIMPSON
Custodian Division/ Busines Unit
Infrastructure Services
Corporate Services
GIS Services Department
Engine ring Services
GEOGRAPHIC SERVICES Engine ring & Park Services
Operations
Technical Services
Technical Services
Infrustructure Services
Technical Services
Technical Services
Technical Services
Urban Design
As et Management, Infrastruture
Spatial Services
Design and As ets Department - Technical Infrastructure Services
CHIEF EXECUTIVE
The division or busines unit which is the custodian of the dataset.
Dataset Description
Description
Drainage data captured in Drainage point items,
Part of Infrastructure As ets
Drainage Datasets
CITY STORMWATER
Drainage
Drainage data
Stormwater Drainage Network Drainage
Pipes and Pits
2D AutoCad drawing based on Drainage
in Mapinfo database
Mapinfo -conjunction Huefner
Council stormwater drains
As constructed
NIL
Brief description of the dataset
Format
MapInfo linked to ac es
ESRI shapefiles
MapInfo, SQL-Server and
GIS - Shapefile
ESRI GEODATABASE
4 x GIS layers
GIS - MapInfo
GIS Layer & Autocad DWG
GIS Layer and Autocad file
Cad converted to GIS layer
*.DWG and *.SHP
AutoCad 20 6 drawing
Cad file with Ac es
GIS
GIS
GIS - MapInfo
Cad
Our drainage data comes in two formats
NIL
GIS layer, CAD file, Other (please state)
Ap roximate number of features
130
1321 points, 530 lines, 17 374km Pipes in Sections,
230
13 FEATURE CLASSESS 30,42
50 0
?
10
6729
?
pipe size, invert, pit locations
9,0 0 pits, 10,0 0 pipes
N/A
0
Ap roximate dataset size (MB)
0.14
0.8
Polygons 239kb, Pipes 5.2Mb, 1
13
24
?
10 MB
759 KB CAD FILE
?
4
5 Mb
10MB
6.5Mbytes
3
0
Geographic extent
Metropolitan Council ,
Town of Mosman Park
10 % of LGA of Cockburn
LGA
LGA (32.7SQKM)
City of Rockingham LGA
LGA
LGA boundary
LGA
LGA
?
Limits of Town
LGA Boundary
LGA
part of Gosnels LGA
LGA
Ful LGA of the City of Belmont 10 %
NIL
State, part of State (specify), LGA, part of LGA (specify %)
Quality
Positional ac uracy (m)
sub-metre +- 5cm
2
Betwe n 0.1m to 0.4m
0.3
2
3m
1
1
1
1m
Upto 3 or 4m ac uracy in
2
meter
<1m
1
1
10 %
+/-10 mm
+/- how many metres?
Positional confidence (%)
84%
95%
10 %
10 %
95%
95%
90%
75%
80%
95%
70%
50%
75%
90%
95%
30%
80%
10 %
90%
How confident are you that the data are positionaly ac urate (to
the positional ac uracy noted in the previous question)?
Atribute ac uracy (%)
68%
95%
95%
10 %
95%
90%
60%
75%
80%
5%
10%
50%
50%
90%
80%
70%
80%
0%
90%
How ac urate are the atributes in the dataset? (as a percentage)
Logical consistency (%)
70%
98%
75%
10 %
9 %
95%
75%
75%
50%
95%
60%
0%
0%
90%
75%
0%
80%
10 %
90%
What is your level of confidence in the structure of the dataset's
geometry? (how wel the features con ect within the dataset and to
other related datasets).
Completenes (%)
75%
20%
95%
98%
80%
95%
90%
80%
80%
95%
90%
30%
85%
90%
85%
30%
30%
90%
95%
0%
0%
How complete are the data (as a representation of relevant
stormwater drainage within the geographic extent of the dataset?)
Cur ency
Update method and frequency
We are in the initial
stages of data colection.
An ualy, by consulting
with engine ring regarding
As Cons, Site Inspection with
Sub-Metre GPS. Constantly
as required we kly
MAINTENANCE FORMS,
MONTHLY CYCLE.
Ir egular, quarterly as required Ongoing
Ad hoc.
Complete review &
survey picup to oc ur in 20 7.
With As Constructed
information only.
The data was last updated
20 1, I am cur ently pro fing
Stil capturing the data
As network extended or
modified.
Once a we k as as-
constructed information is
updated when new data is
provided.
Manualy updated as required.
Data recently colected - no
maintenance regime at
as require
Drainage features are recorded on ascon
surveys in PCG94 and AHD. They are
How are the data maintained, and how often?
Data Structure - Features
Pipe sections
10 %
18 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Drainage linework
Pits/ ac es points
89%
16 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pits/ ac es points in the network (eg end wals, end of pipe
Property con ections
3 %
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
Property outlets to the drainage network
Underground conduit pits
3 %
6 1
1
1
1
1
1
Pits/ ac es points in the network
Underground conduits
2 %
4 1
1
1
1
Underground conduit linework
Sump boundaries/ sumps
17%
3
1
1
1
Design boundary extent
1 %
2
1
1
Boundaries for areas of development
Ac es chambers
6%
1
1
Catchments
6%
1
1
Easements
6%
1
1
Gros polutant traps
6%
1
1
Gulies
6%
1
1
Problems with matching to existing data
6%
1
1
An area or notation identifying problems matching the dataset to
th
t di ' d t
t
SEP's
6%
1
1
Soakwels
6%
1
1
sump outlets
6%
1
1
Table drains
6%
1
1
Data Structure - At ributes
For GIS datasets atributes refer to fields in a database (eg a GIS
Pipe Atributes
Diameter
89%
16 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Material
89%
16 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Length
78%
14 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Pipe number or identifier
78%
14 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Invert level (upstream and/or downstream)
72%
13 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stre t name
61%
1 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Construction date
4 %
8 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Catchment number/ id
2 %
4
1
1
1
1
Plan number
2 %
4
1
1
1
1
Condition
17%
3 1
1
1
Subdivision name
17%
3
1
1
1
Ac umulated depreciation
1 %
2
1
1
Item/ design life
1 %
2
1
1
Road number/ road id
1 %
2
1
1
Writen down value
1 %
2
1
1
% of expected life
6%
1
1
Adequacy rating
6%
1
1
Construction company
6%
1
1
Cur ent cost of replacement
6%
1
1
Date Inspected
6%
1
1
Design company
6%
1
1
De-watering factors
6%
1
1
Item type
6%
1
1
Land type
6%
1
1
Linked to as et valuation
6%
1
1
Pipe grade
6%
1
1
Pit Upstream / Downstream & id
6%
1
1
Soil type
6%
1
1
Stage number
6%
1
1
Pit Atributes
Pit number or identifier
78%
14 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Lid type
56%
10 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cover level/ finished surface level
50%
9 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Stre t name
50%
9 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Construction date
4 %
8 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Depth
4 %
8 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Side length
28%
5
1
1
1
1
1
Side width
28%
5
1
1
1
1
1
Pit type
2 %
4
1
1
1
1
Liter traps
17%
3
1
1
1
Pit condition
17%
3
1
1
1
Plan number
17%
3
1
1
1
Ac umulated depreciation
1 %
2
1
1
Catchment number/ id
1 %
2
1
1
Design life
1 %
2
1
1
Subdivision name
1 %
2
1
1
Writen down value
1 %
2
1
1
% of expected life
6%
1
1
Colected by
6%
1
1
Construction material
6%
1
1
Depth to invert
6%
1
1
Design company
6%
1
1
Land type
6%
1
1
Lid condition
6%
1
1
Lid level
6%
1
1
Reduced level
6%
1
1
Replacement cost
6%
1
1
Road number/ road id
6%
1
1
Soil type
6%
1
1
Special Features and Photo Link
6%
1
1
Property Con ection Atributes
Stre t name
2 %
4
1
1
1
1
Diameter
17%
3
1
1
1
Material
17%
3
1
1
1
Property con ection number or identifier
17%
3
1
1
1
Construction date
1 %
2
1
1
Depth
1 %
2
1
1
Plan number
6%
1
1
Underground Conduit Atributes
Conduit number or identifier
1 %
2
1
1
Diameter
1 %
2
1
1
Length
1 %
2
1
1
Material
1 %
2
1
1
Stre t name
1 %
2
1
1
% of expected life
6%
1
1
Ac umulated depreciation
6%
1
1
Adequacy rating
6%
1
1
Catchment id
6%
1
1
Condition
6%
1
1
Construction date
6%
1
1
Design life
6%
1
1
Land type
6%
1
1
Replacement cost
6%
1
1
Soil type
6%
1
1
Subdivision name
6%
1
1
Type
6%
1
1
Writen down value
6%
1
1
Underground Conduit Pit Atributes
Catchment id
1 %
2
1
1
Conduit pit number or identifier
1 %
2
1
1
Depth
1 %
2
1
1
Material
1 %
2
1
1
Stre t name
1 %
2
1
1
% of expected life
6%
1
1
Ac umulated depreciation
6%
1
1
Adequacy rating
6%
1
1
Construction date
6%
1
1
Depth to invert
6%
1
1
Design life
6%
1
1
Land type
6%
1
1
Pit type
6%
1
1
Reduced level
6%
1
1
Replacement cost
6%
1
1
Soil type
6%
1
1
Subdivision name
6%
1
1
Writen down value
6%
1
1
Note: the data structure and atributes listed in this question aire are based on the Consultant/Developer specifications (D-Spec) published at www.dspec.com.au