OAG08-Audit Group 4

OAG08-Audit Group 4

-

English
53 Pages
Read
Download
Downloading requires you to have access to the YouScribe library
Learn all about the services we offer

Description

Hay Group Insight2008 Employee Survey EOffice of the Auditor General of CanadaOrganization Group: Audit Group 4June, 2008© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights ReservedTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageI. Overview of ResultsResponse RateProfile ChartsII. Detailed Results Overall Rating 1Perceived Impact of Work 2Vision and Direction of the Office 3Office Values 5Personal Values 7Management of the Office 8© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved1 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPageII. Detailed Results (continued)Organizational Intentions 10Work Unit 11Supervision 14Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives 18Career Management 22Career Progress 24Promotion Process 28Resource allocation 29Pressures at work 30Stress 32© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved2 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYTable of ContentsHay Group InsightPage II. Detailed Results (continued)Work/Life Balance 32Work Arrangements 33Work Environment 34Harassment 35Discrimination 36Respectful Workplace 37Language of Work 38Official Languages 39Language Training 41Departures 43Concluding Impressions 44© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved3 OAG 2008 EMPLOYEE SURVEYI. Overview of ResultsHay Group InsightResponse RateNumber of Percentage of Number of Number ofRespondents Respondents Respondents Respondents2008 2008 2006 2004___________________________________________________________Total OAG 555 ...

Subjects

Informations

Published by
Reads 10
Language English
Report a problem
Hay GroupInsight
2008Employee Survey Officeof the Auditor General of Canada
Organization Group: Audit Group 4
© 2008 Hay Group Limited. All Rights Reserved
June, 2008
I.O
Response Rate Profile Charts
Hay GroupInsight
Table of Contents
1 2 3 5 7 8
Page
II. Detailed Results Overall Rating Perceived Impact of Work Vision and Direction of the Office Office Values Personal Values Management of the Office
002©yaH8orG1iRhgstRsereevOdupLimited.AllYEVRUS8002AGEEOYPLEMivwevreeRusofstl
iLpuorGyaH8002htigRllAd.temi2©YEdeAOG02seResvrYEESURV08EMPLO
Page
II. Detailed Results (continued) Organizational Intentions Work Unit Supervision Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives Career Management Career Progress Promotion Process Resource allocation Pressures at work Stress
10 11 14 18 22 24 28 29 30 32
Table of Contents
Hay GroupInsight
puLGorH8ya2©00ghRilAl.editim2GAOdevreseRst3008MELPYOEESRUVEY
Page
Table of Contents
II. Detailed Results (continued) Work/Life Balance Work Arrangements Work Environment Harassment Discrimination Respectful Workplace Language of Work Official Languages Language Training Departures Concluding Impressions
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 43 44
Hay GroupInsight
08EMPLOedOAG20YEEYEUSVRAd.temiLipouGrvreseRsthgiRll4aHy0280©
Audit Group 4 - Thompson
I. Overview of Results
Response Rate
Total OAG
Hay GroupInsight
28 72%
38
28
555 93%
545
450
Number of Percentage of Number of Number of Respondents Respondents Respondents Respondents 2008 2008 2006 2004 ___________________________________________________________
theresuaredtoltyocpmebdrice.nsheTizanioatrehtgrostlofo7groineredlustercsnatsoiqeuli0leddmieThƒ.srotcafrospuseResvrdeAOG02mited.AllRightYEE08LOMPEYERVSUvreioevrastwhchefƒTwingollotsnoitsnactahrimaumsue8q2zefoepmeecregatnrhopoesyelowesuoarlbydndefvadtheovinOAGanbatadyaHllaremeAthorNofkanazitaginnroiracrtschaƒTheons.ineicndesathetyaHroNofmhtratgroupofitem.sTƒehpolttderitsuleseaticndffideht(ecnereentpercatiodeviteew)nbehpnetnaMareearCorctafehtrofnosirompaalcorichistnoersiTƒehno.sespronsiinudImgCehlcnofnotrocomparistorical0260hsiegemtnƒ.divorperevognisontiesilwhdanunbmfafuqreoanaaregeoveraepsificuqcitsekasspreseontosfoterdn,scnamallindicationsofrlierpfohtemayoupsegrthesevrusllatolposhuts,orctfayelpm.etebocni
Hay GroupInsight
Profiled Factors
onaautiestisqu-04no1ontawsorctfasbldoushetaertechtiwdtheremaybeinsfuificnetadattkeasind002ƒF6.sroemouorg,sp2008HayGroupLi©5
deAOG02seResvrllRightmited.AYEEYERVSUE08LOMP©GroupLi2008Hay6
-30
OAG 2008
OAG 2006
OAG 2004
-10
-20
Overall Results - Total OAG
10
20
Concluding Impressions
0
Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office
Supervision
Career Management
Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives Resource allocation
Stress
30
Supervision
Hay GroupInsight Vision & Direction of Office
30
Career Management
Resource allocation
Monetary & Non-Monetary Incentives
20
-20
-10
Stress
Concluding Impressions
0
10
-30
2008
2006
2004
Organization Group: Audit Group 4
thgiRllvreseRs20GOAedLOMPE08USVREYEYE7©0280aHyGroupLimited.A
HayGroup
Q. 1a1 Overall, how would you rate the Office as an organization to work for?
Organization Group 1a-Overall Rating
11% 1% +6 +18 +28 +24
Percent of RespondentsDiff Diff Diff Diff r Pub fromfrom from G oupValid N Below AverageAboveAverage Average Sec Norm2006 2004
Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28
88%
86%
Q. 1a2 How would you rate the Office as a place to work now, compared with two years ago?
14% -1 +8 +26 +22
Percent of RespondentsDiff Diff Diff Diff m Pub fromfrom from About the sa e It's Not as Good Now Sec2006 2004 Norm
6% -8 +4 - +3
GroupValid NIt's Better Now
56%
Total Office of the Auditor 43238% General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 2417%
13% -24 -20 - -18
70%
OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008
Page 1
nospmohTfor:AuResultsp4oRnidtrGuo
dit:Aup4GrouRsefrolustnoRmohTnosp
Total Office of the Auditor 548 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28
91%
86%
Q. 1b2 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization where I can clearly perceive the effectiveness of my work Percent of RespondentsDiff Diff Diff Diff al from from Pub from GroupV id NVery Satisfied at all Satisfied Neutral Not Norm Sec2006 2004
Organization Group 1b-Perceived Impact of work
HayGroup
8% 1% +7 +4 - -
Q. 1b1 How would you rate your current satisfaction with the following? Being part of an organization that contributes to the public good Percent of RespondentsDiff Diff Diff Diff GroupValid N Not at all SatisfiedVery Satisfied NeutralceSbuPmro042006fm02forrmfromNo
79%
14% 7% +18 +5 +2 -5
Page 2
OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008
75%
19% 6% +16 +22 -2 -9
10% 4% -9 -10 - -
Total Office of the Auditor 547 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28
10% 4% -1 -10 - -
OAG 2008 Employee Survey June, 2008
6% 1% +2 +9 - +34
7% +1 -3 - +34
Diff Diff Diff Diff Tend to DisagreemorffmroPbuScemNofrorm 2006 2004
6% 1% +3 +9 - -
Page 3
Total Office of the Auditor 553 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28
HayGroup
Diff Diff Diff Diff T nub e d to DisagreeSec04PoNmrformfmroorf02m6002
Total Office of the Auditor 554 General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 28
93%
93%
86%
93%
Q. 1c2 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I have a good understanding of the vision and values of the Office Percent of Respondents GroupValid N Agree nor NeitherTend to Agree Disagree
Percent of Respondents Neither Agree nor Disagree
Q. 1c3 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I support the vision and values of the Office GroupValid NTend to Agree
19% 8% +2 +11 - -
Diff Diff Diff Diff  efrom from Pub from Tend to Disagre Norm Sec2006 2004
Total Office of the Auditor 55173% General (OAG) Audit Group 4Ron Thompson 2857%
29% 14% -9 -4 - -
Q. 1c1 How strongly do you agree or disagree with the following statement? I understand where the Office is going over the next two years Percent of Respondents GroupValid N Neither Agree norTend to Agree Disagree
Organization Group 1c-Vision and Direction of the Office
oup4RoAuditGrstfro:RselupsomThnon